by Ann Widger | April 21, 2014
The federal budget bill, authored by U.S. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and approved this month in the House of Representatives, privatizes Medicare and takes billions from Medicaid. It’s so unfair to current and future retirees that even many arch-conservatives refused to endorse it.
One of its worst provisions would raise the age when people can start receiving Medicare benefits. Here are four ways that could hurt you:
- The House budget would delay the age of eligibility for Medicare from 65 to 67, starting with baby boomers born in 1959. Those retiring at 65 without employer sponsored health care coverage would be left to fend for themselves for two years. This section of the Ryan budget should be called, “Good luck to you – just don’t get sick.”
- Retirees who do have employer coverage also could be in trouble. The reason is that employers would carry the full cost of health care for those ages 65 and 66 – retirees who currently have Medicare as their primary insurance. If the eligibility age were 67 today, employer health costs would be $4.5 billion higher. So it would be no surprise if many employers shift these costs to retirees by raising premiums, deductibles and co-pays. Even worse, some employers will drop early-retiree coverage altogether to avoid paying so much more.
- Retirees who are 65 and 66 won’t have an easy time buying individual insurance policies. That’s because the Ryan budget repeals provisions in the Affordable Care Act that protect consumers from the worst insurance company abuses. Once again, insurers will be able to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions. So, if you’re one of the millions of younger retirees who had cancer, high blood pressure or diabetes, good luck buying health insurance at any price.
- Finally, if the eligibility age was 67 today, Medicare’s Part B premiums would go up 3 percent for all participants. Why? Because the healthiest and youngest retirees would no longer offset spending for the sickest and oldest retirees. The result would be higher costs across the board for all who remain in Medicare.
Americans need a federal budget that sets a course for a better future, not one that curtails health care coverage for those who need it most.
by Pablo Ros | April 21, 2014
The average CEO in America made $11.7 million in 2013, or 331 times as much as the average worker, according to AFL-CIO’s 2014 Executive PayWatch, which helps raise awareness about income disparity in our nation.
According to PayWatch, the average CEO made 774 times more than minimum wage workers.
“America is supposed to be the land of opportunity, a country where hard work and playing by the rules would provide working families a middle-class standard of living,” the report observes. “But in recent decades, corporate CEOs have been taking a greater share of the economic pie while wages have stagnated and unemployment remains high.”
On PayWatch, you can hear from a Walmart worker who makes $12,000 a year as a customer service manager. That’s less than many CEOs make in a single hour. So many Walmart employees are in need of government assistance, in fact, it’s estimated that taxpayers subsidize the company’s profits to the tune of nearly a million bucks per store per year.
Check out PayWatch and help spread the word that income inequality is taking our country in the wrong direction.
by David Kreisman | April 21, 2014
ST. PAUL – Child care providers are in a unique position to identify the signs of autism in a child, since these become apparent between the ages of 2 and 3.
That’s why AFSCME’s Child Care Providers Together (CCPT) in Minnesota joined hands with the Autism Society of Minnesota to launch a pilot program that is the first step toward offering affordable autism training and certification to providers across the state.
Maria Thor, a CCPT member and provider from St. Paul, emphasized the usefulness of this pilot training program.
“They gave us some great tools and techniques to help children self-moderate and self-regulate,” she said. “These are useful not only with children on the autism spectrum, but everyone. Because everyone is on the same page and has the same expectations, nobody feels ‘different’ or is given special treatment.”
Providers are also learning the different ways to talk to parents about certain behaviors they may notice in a child, and how to encourage parents to have their child evaluated for autism.
Through this and other training programs organized by AFSCME’s Child Care Providers Together, providers and parents can team up to assist the child’s progress with activities specifically designed to help children with autism.
Twenty Minnesota child care providers participated in this innovative training, which is another example of how partnerships between AFSCME members and other local organizations improve lives in communities across our nation.
by Clyde Weiss | April 21, 2014
To Brenda Crawford, a registered nurse in California, and her colleagues at Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS), forming a labor union to have a voice on the job proved to be a very difficult task.
UHS management did everything it could to make it impossible for their workers to have a fair union election. Management launched an aggressive campaign to block the union, including making anti-union communications to employees every few days, in person and by sending messages over the company’s internal electronic mail system.
Anti-union text message blasts were sent to the registered nurses’ personal cell phones, even though use of the system was previously limited for emergency messages.
That’s why Crawford, who since began working a second job and is now a member of United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals (UNAC/UHCP), an AFSCME affiliate, is speaking out against these unfair practices. This month, she testified before the National Labor Relations Board, or NLRB, in Washington, DC, to help other workers form their own unions without having to overcome unfair obstacles employers often place in their way. The NLRB is considering changes to union election rules that would bring fairness to workers who wish to have a voice on the job.
Crawford told the NLRB there was nothing union organizers could do to respond with equal vigor or speed to UHS management’s ugly tactics. The workers seeking to join the union held their election last July and lost. Crawford said workers’ personal phone numbers and email addresses should be shared with the union in order to level the playing field.
Crawford also said she supported other NLRB proposed rule changes that would remove obstacles from workers seeking union representation.
In addition to Crawford’s testimony, UNAC/AFSCME also filed a statement with the NRLB supporting the proposed rule changes designed to bring fairness to union representation elections. Despite opposition to the changes by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AFSCME will continue to fight to make sure workers are allowed a voice on the job.
by Helen Cox | April 17, 2014
Monroe, La. – When Monroe City Attorney Nancy Summersgill earlier this month announced she would terminate AFSCME Local 2388’s contract, it was a low point for a community where public services were neglected for far too long.
In recent years, reductions in city personnel deteriorated public services. Just a few years ago, 13 sanitation trucks served local residents. Now, only five do.
But city workers who are members of Local 2388 stood up to this latest attack on their community’s wellbeing and rallied immediately in support of protecting public services and their contract. They pointed out major contract violations and convinced Summersgill and Mayor Jamie Mayo to reverse their union-busting position. Today, city government is more willing than ever before to speak directly with workers.
AFSCME workers are fighting to increase city personnel and for an across-the-board $1-an-hour raise. They want all workers to make at least a living wage of $10 an hour.
“Now that we’ve protected our rights, we can do anything,” said Robert Johnson, president of Local 2388. “We’ve doubled the size of our union since this fight began. We’re always stronger if we stand together on behalf of the community and the workers.”
by Olivia Sandbothe | April 17, 2014
Public employee pensions benefit more than just the retirees who receive them. As a new report out of California shows, pensions are good for the whole economy.
The state-conducted study concludes that CalPERS, the California public employee retirement system, creates more than $30 billion in economic growth each year.
When workers save for retirement, they are ensuring they will have money to spend at local businesses in later years. California’s retired workers spend enough to add $30.4 billion to the state’s economy. The study estimates this spending is responsible for creating more than 100,000 jobs. That’s in addition to the $20.7 billion the CalPERS portfolio invests in local businesses.
When people like San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed talk about dismantling California retiree benefits, they’re not just threatening the livelihood of retired public servants. Pension “reform” is a danger to jobs and growth in every part of the economy.
by Joye Barksdale | April 17, 2014
State College, Pa. – AFSCME Pres. Lee Saunders encouraged Penn State University students to be “disrupters” and join the labor movement if they want to make a difference today, much like the sanitation workers of AFSCME Local 1733 did in 1968.
Saunders gave the 23rd annual Philip Murray Memorial Labor Lecture this week at Penn State’s School of Labor and Employment Relations. The audience included students, faculty members, AFSCME members and members of other unions.
The lecture is named for Murray, the first president of the United Steelworkers of America, who was also the second president of the Congress of Industrial Organizations. It brings labor leaders together with members of the university community to talk about the role of the labor movement in a democratic society.
Saunders said the sanitation workers were risk-takers whose bold strike “upset the social order” and challenged the status quo. He also talked about the labor movement’s role as the last line of defense for people who are beset by student-loan debt, low wages, disappearing retirement security and other financial pressures. He reminded the audience of the labor movement’s achievements and said unions are the key to an economy that works for everyone.
Unions are more important than ever at a time when there is a tremendous gap between the very wealthy and the average working family, he said.
“Look, we aren’t bashing the rich. This isn’t about income envy,” Saunders said. “What we’re saying is that our nation isn’t going to get any stronger economically if money keeps flowing out of workers’ pockets and into Donald Trump’s.”
There is another problem with tremendous income inequality, he said. “When so much wealth and power rests with so few people, they exercise outsize influence on our political system, drowning out other voices. They rig the system.”
Unions are the answer, he said, because they “play a role in lifting up all workers whether or not they’re in unions. The contracts we bargain put pressure even on non-unionized employers to increase wages and benefits. In areas where there is a union, you get paid more. Not just if you’re in the union. All of you get paid more.”
Saunders mentioned the walkouts by workers in fast-food chains, as well as the recent move by football players at Northwestern University to join a union. In 2014, he said, “people view joining a union as radical.”
“Learn about and become part of the American labor movement,” he said. “Be a disrupter, just like the sanitation workers of Memphis were in 1968.”
by David Patterson | April 16, 2014
Public employees of a child support agency in Mahoning County, Ohio, are trying to figure out why they were excluded from a pay increase given to other county employees in exchange for agreeing to pay more in pension contribution costs.
The workers are members of AFSCME Local 3577, Council 8, and they are protesting what they see as unfair treatment on the part of the county government. They are employed at the Mahoning County Child Support Enforcement Agency, or CSEA.
“We are not asking to be rewarded,” said Local 3577 Pres. Jeannette Droney. “CSEA employees are only asking to be treated the same as other Mahoning County employees.”
In 18 other county agencies, including the county commissioner’s office, all affected employees received a cost-neutral pay adjustment that makes up for the increase in individual pension costs. The so-called “pension flip” places the full pension contribution costs on the employee and ends the county’s past practice of covering a significant portion of them.
“We’re not against paying our share of pension costs,” Droney said. “We just want to have the county make up the difference to our members like they did with everyone else, including CSEA management.”
David Arquilla, vice president of Local 3577, said it was an issue of fairness.
“We want to know why our members are singled out,” he said.
by Clyde Weiss | April 16, 2014
Ken Weaver, a Wisconsin AFSCME member who fought with thousands of others in 2011 to try to preserve workers’ collective bargaining rights, recently spoke to hundreds of Connecticut union members, warning them that the same could happen to them if they’re not vigilant.
Weaver, a retired Wisconsin Department of Transportation construction inspector and member of AFSCME Local 758, Council 24, spoke at the “We Are Not Wisconsin” forum held in Middletown, Conn., and sponsored by the State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC), of which AFSCME Connecticut Council 4 is a member.
Despite its name, the forum is meant to bring home the reality that Connecticut, like any other state, could lose its union rights if right-wing lawmakers gain control of the Statehouse and the governor’s mansion.
Weaver noted that Wisconsin was once a union-friendly state. Then elections in 2010 turned the tables on workers, bringing in a right-wing governor, Scott Walker, and tipping the balance of power in the Legislature to favor anti-union forces.
“That is all this is – politics,” Weaver said.
Weaver told his Connecticut sisters and brothers that though workers in Wisconsin “may have been knocked down, we’re fighting every day. The war is long from over. It never ends.”
Dawn Tyson, president of Connecticut AFSCME Local 538, Council 4, was among those impressed by Weaver’s message. A processing technician for the Department of Social Services, she said Weaver’s comments “really brought it home for me. They made me feel energized. But they also awakened me and made me realize the threat is very real. It is an ever-present danger.”
by Olivia Sandbothe | April 16, 2014
Despite strong opposition from both sides of the aisle, extremist lawmakers in the Missouri state Legislature are pushing ahead with a so-called “right-to-work” law that could mean a big pay cut for the state’s middle class.
HB 1770, sponsored by Eric Burlison of Springfield, stalled this week after nearly a third of House Republicans voted against it in a procedural vote. But Speaker Tim Jones says he’ll do whatever it takes to get the votes he needs to pass the bill. Why? Because big national donors like the Koch brothers and fiscal radicals like Grover Norquist issued their marching orders, and House leadership isn’t about to disappoint the people who help pay their bills.
Many members of the Legislature know that “right-to-work” isn’t right for Missouri, and Missouri’s workers don’t support it. Republican John McCaherty says he voted against it because he knows that “right-to-work” will hurt his constituents. If HB 1770 were to pass, he says, “here in the St. Louis area we undoubtedly would see a drop in wages.”
But concern for the people you represent is no way to get ahead in a political climate that’s all about out-of-state money. One Republican representative, Ron Hicks of St. Louis, found himself hounded by interest groups who smeared his name and even sent robo-calls to his home phone number following his “No” vote.
“I understand right-to-work is a big issue across the nation, but I think I should still be able to vote the way my constituents want me to vote,” he told the Washington Post. “This one time I’m going outside the box to stick up for my constituents and all the sudden I’m a RINO [Republican in name only]?”
If the bill passes the Legislature, the measure will appear on a statewide ballot in August, where wildly misleading ballot language will obscure the real intent of the law.
But Missouri voters should make no mistake: “right-to-work” isn’t about your rights at all. It’s simply an attempt to sow division among coworkers and drain union resources so that workers can’t bargain for better pay and conditions.