by Olivia Sandbothe | April 24, 2014
In his five years as a custodian at the University of California, Berkeley, Damon Frick was known as a dedicated worker who cared deeply for his family and for the UC students he worked among.
“Damon was always the first person I saw and spoke to on Saturdays and Sundays, when he worked on the fifth floor [of International House],” student Jeff Schauer recalled in the Daily Californian.
On April 7, Frick was cleaning windows in a campus auditorium when the mechanical lift he was standing on collapsed. He passed away in the hospital the next day.
Frick was a proud member of AFSCME Local 3299, which has long advocated for stronger safety standards for workers at UC. The local is now raising funds to help his family.
Frick is survived by his partner, Denise, and two children.
“He loved his kids,” says co-worker Cliff Addison. “That’s all he talked about – his kids.”
Local 3299 raised more than $3,000 for the Damon Frick fund. You can help with a donation by visiting this page.
by Cheryl Kelly | April 24, 2014
The U.S. Supreme Court stood with Florida state employees Monday when it refused to hear Gov. Rick Scott’s appeal to a circuit court decision that found his random drug testing policy unconstitutional.
Governor Scott’s 2011 executive order mandated all 85,000 state employees submit to invasive drug testing, without any suspicion of drug use. In response, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Florida filed a lawsuit challenging the order on behalf of AFSCME Council 79, which represents 40,000 public workers. The U.S. Supreme Court decision ends the appeals process for Governor Scott, leaving in place a ruling by the 11th Circuit Court, which found that the random testing violates Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches.
“The public servants who would be impacted by this executive order have been working under a needless cloud of suspicion, treating them like suspected criminals ever since the executive order was signed by Governor Scott,” said AFSCME Florida Council 79 Pres. Jeanette D. Wynn (also an AFSCME International vice president) on Monday. “Today’s decision by the court lifts that cloud once and for all and says that people don’t lose their constitutional rights simply because they work for the public. We hope the governor finally reads the writing on the wall and stops demonizing the tens of thousands of public workers who, under his executive order, would be required to sacrifice their right to be free from invasive searches as a condition of their employment.”
The Supreme Court decision is the latest in a series of victories for the privacy rights of state employees. The Scott administration wasted hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars trying to defend unconstitutional drug testing policies.
That’s why the ACLU of Florida also filed a public records request to determine how much money the state spent fighting court decisions that declared its drug testing policies unconstitutional.
“Despite his claim that he is a small-government conservative seeking to limit the power of government in our lives and government expenses, Governor Scott spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars defending policies that require people to submit their bodily fluids for government inspection,” said ACLU of Florida Exec. Dir. Howard Simon. “The courts have spoken time and again on this issue, and it’s time for Governor Scott to cut his losses and face the facts. The government can’t subject entire classes of people to urinalysis without reasonable suspicion or a genuine threat to public safety.”
by Pablo Ros | April 23, 2014
Pat Beall, a reporter for the Palm Beach Post, won the 2014 Hillman Prize for Newspaper Journalism for her investigative series shedding light on human rights abuses and corruption within the private prison industry.
Beall’s multi-part investigation linked a pattern of human rights abuses to corporate cost-cutting.
In bestowing the award, the Sidney Hillman Foundation noted that Beall compiled 13 years of national data to document “the squalor, violence and abuse” that result from a pattern of hiring too few corrections officers or officers with little experience.
Just as importantly, Beall’s investigation traces the nationwide push for private prisons to laws crafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, an extremist group funded by the Koch brothers that is also responsible for crafting and pushing anti-worker laws that seek to destroy labor unions.
ALEC-backed laws encouraged growth of the private prison industry and “bloated prison populations, even as crime rates inched downward,” the Foundation noted.
Read Beall’s full investigative series here.
by David Patterson | April 23, 2014
When residents and workers of the small town of Olivia, Minn., discovered that its school board members planned to outsource its custodial staff, they made a BOLD move to stop it – the Bird Island Olivia Lake Lillian District (BOLD) coalition sprang into action.
BOLD quickly mobilized with AFSCME custodians, the teaching staff, paraprofessionals and the food service staff in the school district, as well as parents and local residents to hold a rally to show strength and solidarity with the custodial staff. School custodians, members of AFSCME Local 1686, first heard about the outsourcing scheme in March.
In mid-April, a special school board meeting was called to vote on the action to secure formal proposals to outsource the work, and that’s when BOLD really showed its strength. More than 150 concerned citizens contacted school board members and packed the board meeting to voice their concerns and tell the board they did not support outsourcing the custodians’ jobs.
The call to preserve high-quality public services by preventing outsourcing was heard loudly and clearly. The board voted six-to-one against taking bids for the work.
“We really mobilized in the community and made sure that the school board members understood that parents and taxpayers and school employees did not support the outsourcing ploy,” said Council 65 staff representative Serena Vergin. “BOLD showed that the entire community stood with these workers.”
The AFSCME custodians are now in contract mediation with the school system and hope to reach a contract settlement covering them through 2015.
by Olivia Sandbothe | April 23, 2014
We all know that union members are paid more and receive better benefits than their non-union counterparts. But that doesn’t mean that union contracts only help union members. When it comes to retirement and health benefits, unions are good for the whole family.
A new study by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that workers with union contracts are far more likely than nonunion workers to receive benefits that their family members can use. The effect is particularly dramatic when it comes to workers who are in same-sex domestic partnerships.
Workers who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement are about four times as likely to have a retirement plan that includes survivor benefits for a same-sex partner, married or unmarried. And union health care packages are almost twice as likely to allow same-sex partners as beneficiaries.
LGBT Americans have long struggled to secure their rights at work, and benefits for same-sex partners still lag far behind those for heterosexual couples. But as the BLS statistics show, unions are a critical voice in the fight for equality, and AFSCME will continue to fight for families of all kinds.
by Ann Widger | April 21, 2014
The federal budget bill, authored by U.S. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan and approved this month in the House of Representatives, privatizes Medicare and takes billions from Medicaid. It’s so unfair to current and future retirees that even many arch-conservatives refused to endorse it.
One of its worst provisions would raise the age when people can start receiving Medicare benefits. Here are four ways that could hurt you:
- The House budget would delay the age of eligibility for Medicare from 65 to 67, starting with baby boomers born in 1959. Those retiring at 65 without employer sponsored health care coverage would be left to fend for themselves for two years. This section of the Ryan budget should be called, “Good luck to you – just don’t get sick.”
- Retirees who do have employer coverage also could be in trouble. The reason is that employers would carry the full cost of health care for those ages 65 and 66 – retirees who currently have Medicare as their primary insurance. If the eligibility age were 67 today, employer health costs would be $4.5 billion higher. So it would be no surprise if many employers shift these costs to retirees by raising premiums, deductibles and co-pays. Even worse, some employers will drop early-retiree coverage altogether to avoid paying so much more.
- Retirees who are 65 and 66 won’t have an easy time buying individual insurance policies. That’s because the Ryan budget repeals provisions in the Affordable Care Act that protect consumers from the worst insurance company abuses. Once again, insurers will be able to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions. So, if you’re one of the millions of younger retirees who had cancer, high blood pressure or diabetes, good luck buying health insurance at any price.
- Finally, if the eligibility age was 67 today, Medicare’s Part B premiums would go up 3 percent for all participants. Why? Because the healthiest and youngest retirees would no longer offset spending for the sickest and oldest retirees. The result would be higher costs across the board for all who remain in Medicare.
Americans need a federal budget that sets a course for a better future, not one that curtails health care coverage for those who need it most.
by Pablo Ros | April 21, 2014
The average CEO in America made $11.7 million in 2013, or 331 times as much as the average worker, according to AFL-CIO’s 2014 Executive PayWatch, which helps raise awareness about income disparity in our nation.
According to PayWatch, the average CEO made 774 times more than minimum wage workers.
“America is supposed to be the land of opportunity, a country where hard work and playing by the rules would provide working families a middle-class standard of living,” the report observes. “But in recent decades, corporate CEOs have been taking a greater share of the economic pie while wages have stagnated and unemployment remains high.”
On PayWatch, you can hear from a Walmart worker who makes $12,000 a year as a customer service manager. That’s less than many CEOs make in a single hour. So many Walmart employees are in need of government assistance, in fact, it’s estimated that taxpayers subsidize the company’s profits to the tune of nearly a million bucks per store per year.
Check out PayWatch and help spread the word that income inequality is taking our country in the wrong direction.
by David Kreisman | April 21, 2014
ST. PAUL – Child care providers are in a unique position to identify the signs of autism in a child, since these become apparent between the ages of 2 and 3.
That’s why AFSCME’s Child Care Providers Together (CCPT) in Minnesota joined hands with the Autism Society of Minnesota to launch a pilot program that is the first step toward offering affordable autism training and certification to providers across the state.
Maria Thor, a CCPT member and provider from St. Paul, emphasized the usefulness of this pilot training program.
“They gave us some great tools and techniques to help children self-moderate and self-regulate,” she said. “These are useful not only with children on the autism spectrum, but everyone. Because everyone is on the same page and has the same expectations, nobody feels ‘different’ or is given special treatment.”
Providers are also learning the different ways to talk to parents about certain behaviors they may notice in a child, and how to encourage parents to have their child evaluated for autism.
Through this and other training programs organized by AFSCME’s Child Care Providers Together, providers and parents can team up to assist the child’s progress with activities specifically designed to help children with autism.
Twenty Minnesota child care providers participated in this innovative training, which is another example of how partnerships between AFSCME members and other local organizations improve lives in communities across our nation.
by Clyde Weiss | April 21, 2014
To Brenda Crawford, a registered nurse in California, and her colleagues at Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS), forming a labor union to have a voice on the job proved to be a very difficult task.
UHS management did everything it could to make it impossible for their workers to have a fair union election. Management launched an aggressive campaign to block the union, including making anti-union communications to employees every few days, in person and by sending messages over the company’s internal electronic mail system.
Anti-union text message blasts were sent to the registered nurses’ personal cell phones, even though use of the system was previously limited for emergency messages.
That’s why Crawford, who since began working a second job and is now a member of United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals (UNAC/UHCP), an AFSCME affiliate, is speaking out against these unfair practices. This month, she testified before the National Labor Relations Board, or NLRB, in Washington, DC, to help other workers form their own unions without having to overcome unfair obstacles employers often place in their way. The NLRB is considering changes to union election rules that would bring fairness to workers who wish to have a voice on the job.
Crawford told the NLRB there was nothing union organizers could do to respond with equal vigor or speed to UHS management’s ugly tactics. The workers seeking to join the union held their election last July and lost. Crawford said workers’ personal phone numbers and email addresses should be shared with the union in order to level the playing field.
Crawford also said she supported other NLRB proposed rule changes that would remove obstacles from workers seeking union representation.
In addition to Crawford’s testimony, UNAC/AFSCME also filed a statement with the NRLB supporting the proposed rule changes designed to bring fairness to union representation elections. Despite opposition to the changes by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AFSCME will continue to fight to make sure workers are allowed a voice on the job.
by Helen Cox | April 17, 2014
Monroe, La. – When Monroe City Attorney Nancy Summersgill earlier this month announced she would terminate AFSCME Local 2388’s contract, it was a low point for a community where public services were neglected for far too long.
In recent years, reductions in city personnel deteriorated public services. Just a few years ago, 13 sanitation trucks served local residents. Now, only five do.
But city workers who are members of Local 2388 stood up to this latest attack on their community’s wellbeing and rallied immediately in support of protecting public services and their contract. They pointed out major contract violations and convinced Summersgill and Mayor Jamie Mayo to reverse their union-busting position. Today, city government is more willing than ever before to speak directly with workers.
AFSCME workers are fighting to increase city personnel and for an across-the-board $1-an-hour raise. They want all workers to make at least a living wage of $10 an hour.
“Now that we’ve protected our rights, we can do anything,” said Robert Johnson, president of Local 2388. “We’ve doubled the size of our union since this fight began. We’re always stronger if we stand together on behalf of the community and the workers.”